Third Party Agreement Law

When a third party chooses to apply the terms of the contract, it can do so against the procedure and has the right to dispose of any available quantity if it is a contracting party, for example. B a defined benefit. [30] An exception is the possibility of terminating and cancelling the contract, as the Committee on Laws held that “the third party should not be allowed to terminate the contract for violation, as this may be contrary to the wishes or interests of the promised person.” [31] The first legislative proposal on the reform of the Privity doctrine was made in 1937; In its sixth interim report, the Committee on Legal Audit proposed a legislative act by Parliament that would allow third parties to enforce the terms of a treaty that provided for admissibility. The Second World War intervened and the report was not implemented; As recently as 1986, it was assumed that Parliament would not act and that any reform would come from judicial sources (notably the House of Lords). [12] The negotiation, development and conclusion of the terms of most third-party agreements (whether real estate or financial agreements) are generally determined by more pressing factors at this stage than the prevention of conflicts between their final terms and those of a construction contract. As mere defenders of construction rights, we will be involved in the process much later or if the contractor may not have been involved. In fact, the lease, modification license or financing agreement are often considered the contractor`s fait accompli – that`s “what it is.” There is no room for manoeuvre and the owner/financier will not accept anything else. From the employer`s (i.e. tenant or borrower) perspective, the employer does not want to be exposed to risk because it has agreed to something “on the line” but cannot cause the contractor to reflect the same “on-the-line” obligations. Therefore, the employer simply wants the contractor to assume all of its obligations (as long as they relate to the work), so that there are no potential deficiencies.

But wait a minute – just because the employer agreed to something on the line (to get his lease or withdraw money) why would the supplier keep the baby? Just as we should never give advice in isolation without understanding the particularities of a workstation (i.e. where it is, what is built, is it a high risk or a high risk to the mill, etc.) and the impact that these specific factors can have on the completion of work in practice, third-party agreements should not be negotiated and negotiated in isolation. Without consultation with contractors and/or construction professionals, it is little or no way to think about how these agreements are related to the contractor`s obligations under the construction contract and the reality of the practical work. Privity`s historical doctrine was of two rules – the first was that a third party could not have obligations imposed by the terms of the contract and, second, that a third party could not enforce a contract for which it had not provided consideration. [3] The first rule was not challenged, while the second rule was described as “one of the generally unloved and criticized spots on the legal landscape.” [4] The second rule was not originally validated. In the 17th century, a third party was allowed to enforce the terms of a contract that benefited him, as demonstrated in Provender v Wood [1627] Hetley 30, where the verdict stated that “the party who is wiretapped can file a complaint.” [5] The first repeal of this Act took place at Bourne v Mason [1669] 1 Vent., where the Court of King`s Bench found that a third party had no right to enforce a contract that was beneficial to it. This judgment was quickly overturned, and decisions immediately after the use of the original rule. [5] The law allows the promise giver to list additional defense measures that can be used against the third party in the contract, which can be used to circumvent the decision of the legal commission, not promising the promise of equal defenses against the third party and simply listing the defense facilities supplementai

— bella.mark